Bureaucratic spin won’t save F-35
pilots being killed in any future conflict involving the latest Sukhoi
The F-35 will share the same skies as the new Su-35S.
Despite that, the Pentagon and Lockheed Martin prefer to pretend this
superior adversary does not exist and spins the F-35 air to air
performance based on comparisons to obsolete aircraft. Lets not even
mention the PAK-FA which will be fielded well before the end of the
decade, a vastly superior aircraft to the JSF and perhaps equal or better
to the F-22.
Criticism of poor air to air
performance by the F-35 has been dismissed by the Pentagon and Lockheed
Martin. The governments bureaucratic spin states the USAF has conducted an
analysis of the F-35's air-to-air performance against all 4th generation
fighter aircraft currently available, and has found the F-35 to be at
least four times more effective. Note they state 4TH GENERATION CURRENTLY
AVAILABLE. They conveniently neglect to mention the latest Su-34 and
Su-35S aircraft which will share the same skies.
Is the F-35 a huge
waste of money and would it have been better spent on more Raptors? We go
where the Pentagon is scared to venture.
NEWS: Israel approves purchase of
20 F-35 Joint Strike Fighters. The Israeli government has tentatively
approved the purchase of 20 F-35 Joint Strike Fighter aircraft.
Introduction to the F-35
The Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II is a fifth-generation, single-seat,
single-engine stealth multirole fighter that can perform close air
support, tactical bombing, and air defense missions. The F-35 has three
different models; one is a conventional takeoff and landing variant, the
second is a short take off and vertical-landing variant, and the third is
a carrier-based variant. Variants:
- F-35A, conventional take off and landing (CTOL) variant.
- F-35B, short-take off and vertical-landing (STOVL) variant.
- F-35C, carrier-based CATOBAR (CV) variant.
The United States intends to buy a total of 2,443 aircraft for an
estimated US$323 billion. The USAF's budget data in 2010 projects the F-35
to have a US$89 million flyaway cost based its planned production of 1,753
F-35As. Lockheed Martin expects to reduce government cost estimates by 20%
Design Features for the
F-35 Joint Strike Fighter can be viewed here
Lockheed Martin Corp. has received a $522 million contract from the U.S.
Defense Department related to its production work on the F-35 Joint Strike
The award, announced early July, provides "long-lead" funds to pay for
materials and supplies involved in making the next production order of the
advanced, stealth fighter jets, the Pentagon said.
Terms call for Lockheed to make another 42 of the radar-evading aircraft,
including 22 conventional versions for the Air Force and 13
short-takeoff/vertical-landing versions for the U.S. Marine Corps. Another
seven carrier-version F-35s will be built for the Navy.
This latest low-rate production deal for the F-35 comes amid renewed
Pentagon pressure on Lockheed to cut costs in the program, which has been
plagued by overruns. Lockheed has promised to reduce the program's costs
by 20 percent.
The company hopes to reach full-rate production of 200 planes a year
within the next five years.
Ultimately, Lockheed hopes to build as many as 4,500 F-35s for the U.S.
and its allies, though the total may ultimately fall far short of that
because of constraints on U.S. military spending.
The Performance Issue
The original design brief for the JSF was that the F-22A would clear the
airspace in any future conflict and deliver air dominance, making it safe
for the Joint STRIKE Fighter to operate and deliver follow-up strike
With the F-22A Raptor program being terminated and insufficient aircraft
to deliver air dominance, this role is now being assigned to the F-35 JSF.
Official arguments designed for consumption of the masses less educated in
aircraft combat technologies, focus on combat effectiveness against top
foreign fighter aircraft such as the Russian Su-27 and MiG-29. Lockheed
Martin and USAF analysts put the loss-exchange ratio at 30-1 for the F-22,
3-1 for the F-35 and 1-1 or less for the F-15, F/A-18 and F-16].
The question that really needs to be answered is how will the F-35 JSF
perform against modern fighters like the Su-35S?
In simple terms air combat is the process of adversary aircraft
approaching, engaging in combat and the survivors departing. This activity
can be broken down to a series of events called a ‘kill-chain’ with the
following stages: ‘Detect-Identify-Engage-Disengage-Destroy’ (DIED2).
F-35A JSFs would enter this kill chain each armed with four AIM-120D
Beyond Visual Range (BVR) missiles and a 25 mm GD ATP GAU-22/A cannon. No
additional weapons or fuel are carried because they compromise the JSFs'
“low observability” to X-Band radar. The Russian Su-35S, enter the kill
chanin armed with four RVV-SD Active Radar Seeker BVR Missiles, four
RVV-SD Infra-Red (IR) Seeker BVR missiles, two RVV-MD Within Visual Range
(WVR) missiles, the 30mm GSh-301 cannon, KNIRTI SAP-518 jammers on the
wingtips and a 6,000 litre conformal tank between the engines. Each
aircraft has the full range of sensors and countermeasures.
"It takes no Einstein to see that from the get-go, things are not looking good."
Aside from all the other problems facing the JSF going toe to toe with an
F-35S, western pilots must also be proficient in evasion tactics for no less than six
different families of BVR missile airframes, and four different categories
of missile seeker. The endgame radiofrequency and optical countermeasures
suites in a Western airframe must be effective against seven different
families of missile seeker, including variants thereof. A pilot flying a
Russian or Chinese supplied fighter only needs tactics and technology to
defeat the AIM-120B/C/D AMRAAM. Not included is the R-27AE Alamo with a
digital variant of the RVV-SD active radar terminal seeker
Theoretically the JSF should have an advantage in being able to launch BVR
undetected. This might be true for 90’s model Su-27 and MiG-29’s but not
for the Su-35S.
This is the primary sensor for jet fighters. The radar cross section of
the F-35A is substantially lower than that of the Su-35S especially in the
front sector, but the Sukhoi has sufficient power and a much larger
antenna to partially overcome that difference. Both types are ‘networked’
so in a multi-ship engagement, the geometrical spread of the Su-35S flight
in part negates the lower observability of the JSF by illuminating the JSF
from angles where its low observability is weakest. Expect the F-35A to
often get the ‘first look’, but the Su-35S flight to detect the JSF
outside the range of the JSFs' BVR missiles. So where it matters, the
limited low observability of the JSF provides little advantage.
Variant details and Specifications
The F-35A is the conventional takeoff and landing (CTOL) variant intended
for the US Air Force and other air forces. It is the smallest, lightest
F-35 version and is the only variant equipped with an internal cannon, the
GAU-22/A. This 25 mm cannon is a development of the GAU-12 carried by the
USMC's AV-8B Harrier II. It is designed for increased effectiveness
compared to the 20 mm M61 Vulcan cannon carried by other USAF fighters.
The F-35A is expected to match the F-16 in maneuverability and
instantaneous and sustained high-g performance, and outperform it in
stealth, payload, range on internal fuel, avionics, operational
effectiveness, supportability, and survivability. It also has an internal
laser designator and infrared sensors, equivalent to the Sniper XR pod
carried by the F-16, but built in to remain stealthy.
The A variant is primarily intended to replace the USAF's F-16 Fighting
Falcon, beginning in 2013, and replace the A-10 Thunderbolt II starting in
The F135 engine with lift fan, roll posts, and rear vectoring nozzle, as
designed for the F-35B, at the Paris Air Show, 2007
The F-35B is the short takeoff and vertical landing (STOVL) variant of the
aircraft. Similar in size to the A variant, the B sacrifices some fuel
volume to make room for the vertical flight system. Takeoffs and landing
with vertical flight systems are by far the riskiest, and in the end, a
decisive factor in design. Like the AV-8B Harrier II, the B's guns will be
carried in a ventral pod. Whereas F-35A is stressed to 9 g, the F-35B is
stressed to 7 g. Unlike the other variants, the F-35B has no landing hook;
the "STOVL/HOOK" button in the cockpit initiates conversion instead of
dropping the hook.
The British Royal Air Force and Royal Navy plan to use this variant to
replace their Harrier GR7/GR9s. The United States Marine Corps intends to
purchase 340 F-35Bs to replace all current inventories of the F/A-18
Hornet (A, B, C and D-models), and AV-8B Harrier II in the fighter, and
attack roles. The USMC is investigating an electronic warfare role for the
F-35B to replace the service's EA-6B Prowlers.
One of the British requirements was that the F-35B design should have a
Ship-borne Rolling and Vertical Landing (SRVL) mode so that wing lift
could be added to powered lift to increase the maximum landing weight of
carried weapons. This method of landing is slower than wire arrested
landing, and could disrupt regular carrier operations. The UK are
developing a SRVL method to operate F-35Bs from carriers without
disrupting carrier operations landings as the landing method uses the
same pattern of approach as wire arrested. With SRVL, the aircraft is able
to "bring back" 2 x 1K JDAM, 2 x AIM-120 and reserve fuel.
The F-35B was unveiled at Lockheed Martin's Fort Worth plant on 18
December 2007, and the first test flight was on 11 June 2008. The B
variant is expected to be available beginning in 2012.
The F-35C carrier variant has a larger, folding wing and larger control
surfaces for improved low-speed control, and stronger landing gear and
hook for the stresses of carrier landings. The larger wing area allows for
decreased landing speed, increased range and payload, with twice the range
on internal fuel compared with the F/A-18C Hornet, achieving much the same
goal as the heavier F/A-18E/F Super Hornet.
The United States Navy will be the sole user for the carrier
variant. It intends to buy 480 F-35Cs to replace the F/A-18A, B, C, and D
Hornets. The F-35C will also serve as a stealthier complement to the Super
Hornet. On 27 June 2007, the carrier variant completed its Air System
Critical Design Review (CDR). This allows the first two functional
prototype F-35C units to be produced. The C variant is expected to be
available beginning in 2014. The first production F-35C was rolled out on 29 July 2009.
Specifications (F-35A Lightning II)
• Crew: 1
• Length: 51.4 ft (15.67 m)
• Wingspan: 35 ft (10.7 m)
• Height: 14.2 ft (4.33 m)
• Wing area: 460 ft² (42.7 m²)
• Empty weight: 29,300 lb (13,300 kg)
• Loaded weight: 44,400 lb (20,100 kg)
• Max takeoff weight: 70,000 lb (31,800 kg)
• Powerplant: 1× Pratt & Whitney F135 afterburning turbofan
o Dry thrust: 28,000 lbf (125 kN)
o Thrust with afterburner: 43,000 lbf (191 kN)
• Internal fuel: 18,480 lb (8,382 kg)
• Maximum speed: Mach 1.6 (1,283 mph, 2,065 km/h)
• Range: 1,200 nmi (2,220 km) on internal fuel
• Combat radius: 610 nmi (1,110 km) on internal fuel
• Service ceiling: 60,000 ft (18,288 m)
• Rate of climb: classified (not publicly available)
• Wing loading: 91.4 lb/ft² (446 kg/m²)
• Thrust/weight: **With full fuel: 0.84;
o With 50% fuel: 1.04 B:
• g-Limits: 9 g
• Guns: 1 × GAU-22/A 25 mm (0.984 in) cannon internally with 180 rounds
• Hardpoints: 6× external pylons on wings with a capacity of 15,000 lb
(6,800 kg) and 2 × internal bays with 2 pylons each for a total weapons
payload of 18,000 lb (8,100 kg) and provisions to carry combinations of:
• Missiles: ***Air-to-air: AIM-120 AMRAAM, AIM-132 ASRAAM, AIM-9X
Sidewinder, IRIS-T, Joint Dual Role Air Dominance Missile (JDRADM) (After
• Air-to-ground: AGM-154 JSOW, AGM-158 JASSM
• Bombs: ***Mark 84, Mark 83 and Mark 82 GP bombs
• Mk.20 Rockeye II cluster bomb
• Wind Corrected Munitions Dispenser capable
• Paveway-series laser-guided bombs
• Small Diameter Bomb (SDB)
• B61 nuclear bomb (in 2017)
• Northrop Grumman Electronic Systems AN/APG-81 AESA radar
Differences across variants
1. B is the same, C: 14.9 ft (4.54 m)
2. C is same, B: 60,000 lb (27,000 kg)
3. F-35B: 14,003 lb (6,352 kg); F-35C: 20,085 lb (9,110 kg)
4. F-35B: 7.5 g, F-35C: 7.5 g
5. fitted as an external pod with 220 rounds in the F-35B and F-35C
s flung together in a desperate last minute attempt to avert a
catastrophe of biblical proportions.